Justice Peter Kekemeke vacated the arrest warrant whereas ruling on an oral software by Turaki’s lawyer, Chris Uche SAN, following his (Turaki’s) look in court docket.
When the case was known as, Uche apologised to the court docket for his absence on the final date.
Uche, who claimed to be overseas, stated he returned earlier right this moment and headed straight to the court docket.
He additionally apologised on behalf of his consumer, who he stated is a senior advocate and has the best regards for the court docket.
He stated Turaki’s absence on the final date was not intentional and deliberate, including that he by no means meant to disrespect the court docket.
Sponsored
Uche stated to indicate good religion, he would withdraw the movement on discover filed by his consumer for a keep of execution of the arrest warrant.
He added that Turaki was additionally able to take his plea to a cost pending in opposition to him. Responding, the lawyer to the prosecution, Usman Rabiu, stated he was not against Uche’s purposes.
Rabiu famous that the essence of the arrest warrant was to compel the defendant to look in court docket. He added that since he has attended court docket, the aim of the order for his arrest has been met.
“Since he (Turaki) is right here, we’re not against his being arraigned right this moment.”
Ruling, Justice Kekemeke famous that the defendant attended the court docket on his personal earlier than the arrest warrant might be executed.
The decide additionally famous that his lawyer has apologised for his absence, despite the fact that the explanation why he was absent was not clear from what Uche stated.